Our Take: Community Health Network violated Stark Law, DOJ complaint alleges
Jan 13, 2020
Indianapolis-based Community Health Network (CHN) is facing new allegations that it fraudulently billed Medicare and violated the Physician Self-Referral Law, more commonly known as the Stark Law, after the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a complaint last Tuesday with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.
The health system’s former chief financial officer first lodged the allegations in 2014 in a whistleblower lawsuit. The federal government intervened in that case last August and now has filed its own complaint against CHN.
According to the DOJ, the health system had “employment relationships with a number of physicians that did not meet any Stark Law exception because the compensation [CHN] paid to the physicians was well above fair market value and because [CHN] conditioned paying bonuses on physicians achieving a minimum target of referral revenues to the hospital.”
“[CHN] received referrals from these physicians in violation of the Stark Law and submitted claims to Medicare knowing that the claims for those referred services were not eligible for payment,” the DOJ added.
The health system has denied any wrongdoing.
“We are confident that we have complied with the laws and regulations that govern the way we operate our health network,” a CHN spokeswoman said.
Our Take: If Community Health Network did, in fact, pay its employed and affiliated physicians salaries above fair market value, along with bonuses and other considerations, in exchange for referrals, as the lawsuit contends, then it seems pretty clear that the health system violated the Stark Law — which prohibits physicians and hospitals from making referrals for services paid for by a government program, such as Medicare, to a provider with which they have a financial relationship.
The whistleblower alleged that CHN’s referral scheme started around 2009 and that, over the span of nearly a decade, the health system filed at least tens of thousands of fraudulent claims for services related to the referrals.
Regulators can levy fines of up to $15,000 per illegally billed service and three times the amount overpaid by the government. Given that, it’s safe to say that CHN could be looking at paying millions of dollars if there’s a trial and the decision goes against the health system.
However, as we reported back in October, CMS and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have proposed reforms to the Stark Law and federal anti-kickback laws. Those statutes were implemented when our health care system was structured mostly on fee-for-service arrangements. Now that we’re moving toward value-based care, it can be argued that at times these laws interfere with efforts to coordinate care and reduce waste.
CMS’ proposed rule to reform the Stark Law would create exceptions that would make it possible for providers to enter into value-based arrangements “without fear that legitimate activities to coordinate and improve the quality of care for patients and lower costs” would run afoul of the law.
Will the proposed CMS/HHS rules be finalized before the CHN case can be brought to trial, and could those changes influence the outcome of the case? Or will CHN follow the lead of Sutter Health, who recently paid $46 million to settle similar allegations of violating the Stark Law? Time will tell.
What else you need to know
The Supreme Court gave the Trump administration and plaintiffs until last Friday to respond to a motion filed by a group of Democratic attorneys general and the governor of Kentucky. The filing, submitted on Jan. 3, requested expedited consideration by the Supreme Court to hear an appeal of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Texas v. United States regarding the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA)’s individual mandate. Specifically, the filing requested that the high court hear the case, which seeks to overturn the ACA, and render a decision before the court’s current term ends in June. The court has not yet said whether it will hear the case at all.
Medical One filed a proposed initial public offering of its common stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission, according to a Jan. 3 press release. The San Francisco-based company operates more than 70 primary care clinics in nine major markets across the country. It sells annual memberships that promote faster access to care, and contracts with employers — including Google — to provide care to employees. The company said it has not yet determined the number of shares and price range for the proposed offering.
Drugmakers increased prices for more than 250 drugs at the start of the year, Reuters reported, citing research firm 3 Axis Advisors. The vast majority of those increases were less than 10%, and the median increase was approximately 5%, Reuters noted. A report by FiercePharma published several days later placed the number of drugs with higher prices so far this year at 471. Pfizer alone increased prices for more than 50 drugs, and GlaxoSmithKline said it was raising prices on more than 30. Allergan increased the price of 25 of its drugs by 5%. AbbVie raised the price of top-selling Humira (adalimumab) by 7.4%, according to a Piper Jaffray analyst.
The Beaumont Health-Summa Health merger is moving forward. The two health systems, based in Southfield, Mich., and Akron, Ohio, respectively, announced last Monday that they had signed a definitive agreement to make Summa Health a subsidiary of Beaumont Health. Summa, which has four hospitals, will retain a local board “to support the oversight of clinical operations in Ohio,” and Summa’s health insurance unit, SummaCare, “will remain an integral part of Summa.” The agreement is being submitted for state and federal regulatory approval. If the deal is completed, the combined entity will have annual revenue of $6.1 billion, 12 hospitals, 45,000 employees, and more than 6,000 affiliated physicians.
California is considering selling its own brand of generic drugs in an attempt to rein in costs. The state would contract with one or more drugmakers to manufacture select drugs under the state’s own label. Additionally, the state wants to negotiate with drugmakers to set uniform prices for Californians, including those who are privately insured, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.
Google’s artificial intelligence (AI) may be better at detecting breast cancer than medical experts, research suggests. A recent study was conducted to see if AI could be used to support radiologists in identifying breast cancer more accurately. The researchers found that Google’s algorithm detected breast cancer in screening mammograms with more accuracy, and with fewer false positives and fewer false negatives, than radiologists did, according to the study abstract.
Brad Smith is the new director of CMS’ Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation. He will also serve as the senior adviser to HHS Secretary Alex Azar for value-based transformation, the agencies announced. Smith’s previous roles include chief operating officer of Anthem’s diversified business group and co-founder and CEO of Aspire Health, a palliative care provider.
What we’re reading
How Are ACOs Prioritizing Palliative Care And Other Serious Illness Strategies? Health Affairs, 1.7.20
How AI Helped Get the Right Treatment to Cancer Patients. Boston Consulting Group, 12.6.19